bakunin
i will witness the fall of efrafa

Posts: 1100
Joined: Sep. 2007
|
So while we're on the topic and trying to be more open, give me some perspective.
I read the first few pages of this and don't see anything wrong. The part that struck me was the Antioch College policy/having to ask before advancing past each stage. This is something that I've always tried to practice. Having been put in some uncomfortable positions in the past (not as the one promoting advancement), I've made a point to try and set pretty clear-cut consent.
However, I've found myself put in the position of being with partners who are not open to answering my questions. I get a "I'll tell you when you're going too far." "Just go with it and we'll see what happens." "I don't care."
Unfortunately, that necessitates me, well, going too far before receiving notification that I'm doing anything wrong.
That usually kills the interaction pretty quickly, first on an internal level for myself, and therefore on an external level for the interaction.
Sorry if this is covered and I haven't read far enough, but are these types of scenarios covered in this pamphlet? I'd love to see some coverage of how to deal with that/advice directed at those who are not clear in their boundaries.
Nobodys perfect, and this is not directed at anyone in particular. Its just something that I run into on a frequent basis and am really tired of. This is also not a claim that I'm perfect, of course I'm not. But I take great lengths to have healthy relationships, and would like to hear what others have dealt with.
-------------- "Why do normally reasonable people turn into such elitist wankers when it comes to WIFS? So much for anarchy."
GIVE US THIS DAY OUR DAILY DEAD
|